CMS (Code Management System) is a non-distributed Version Control System
(VCS) developed and maintained at DEC/Compaq/HP as part of the DECset
collection of tools. It runs on OpenVMS VAX, Alpha and I64. A VCS is
also known as revision control or source code management system. To name a
few of the currently popular ones: CVS (concurrent versions system), SVN
("Subversion"), Mercurial and Git.
The base objects in a CMS library are elements. An element consists of all versions of a (source) file. As there are file versions on OpenVMS, here the element versions are named generations. A generation reflects a status of development in the (source) file. For the main line of development the generations are numbers, starting with 1 and increasing. For a side line the generation is called a variant. A variant's generation is specified by the main line number, from which it is derived, and a single letter, specified at reservation time, plus a number, again starting with 1, automatically assigned at checkin/replacement time. For example, an element FOO.C in a library may have generations 1, 2 and 3. When generation 3 exists and generation 2 needs a change, one creates a variant of generation 2, that opens a side line. For example it may be resered as variant with the letter T. When the modified file is put back into CMS with the replace command, CMS creates a variant of FOO.C as generation 2T1.
With variant names only ranging from 'A' to 'Z' it is very likely that in big projects the names are reused. That is, a variant A for one element may not have any relationship to variant A of another element. Also, from looking at CMS libraries, it seems that in some projects there were no guide lines, how to use variant letters: the same letter may be used for different purposes.
The other important object in a CMS library is a class. It describes a development or project status of the software. A class is defined as a set of particular generations of elements. Obviously not all elements of the library need to be in a class and for an element any but only one generation including a variant can be contained in a class.
To compare with Git, the base objects are files as well. However the other important "object" is the current collection of the files know to Git, which describes a development or project status of the software. This "object" essentially is a snapshot of all files known to Git. Files do not have a version or generation identifier attached. A version of a file is defined by the snapshot to which it belongs. So the main developemnt line is a sequence of snapshots. A side line is a branch, which can be created from any snapshot and can have a user defined, descriptive name. A branch again is a sequence of snapshots. In CMS terms, it very likely contains at least one variant. Git snapshots can be tagged, simply said they can have names. All tags are - more or less - a subset of all snapshots. A tag, that is a named snapshot, can be compared to a CMS class. The big difference here is, that a CMS class can be defined at any time, independent of replacing CMS objects, which can be compared to commiting files in Git, which creates a snapshot. But as defining the members of a class is not a single CMS command, and as the generation of an element being a member of a class can be changed any time as well, mapping a CMS class to a Git tag/snapshot is not straight forward.
A possible scheme how a CMS library is imported, by example. The CMS library
BAR.C(1) FOO.C(1) MAIN.C(1) | | | -&------------&------------&--------- Class V1.0 |\ | | BAR.C(2) | MAIN.C(2) | | | | BAR.C(3) | | | | | | -&------------&------------&--------- Class V2.0 | | | | | BAR.C(1A1) | | | | | | ----&---------&------------&--------- Class ECO 1.1 | | | | | / | | BAR.C(4) | | | | | -&------------&------------&--------- Class V2.1 | | | BAR.C(5) FOO.C(2) | | | |
Obviously, the BAR.C(1A1) was created after BAR.C(2), with the merge being done into BAR.C(4). The diagram indicates that variant 1A1 was created after Class V2.0 was created and its members were defined.
Ideally, classes should be converted to tags, variants should be in branches and classes with variants should be tagged in branches as well.
That is, the result of an ideal import should look like
master | BAR.C(1) FOO.C(1) MAIN.C(1) | +<--- tag V1.0 |`---------------------------+<--- branch ECO 1.1 | | BAR.C(2) MAIN.C(2) FOO.C(1) | | BAR.C(1A1) FOO.C(1) MAIN.C(1) BAR.C(3) MAIN.C(2) FOO.C(1) | | +<--- tag ECO 1.1 +<--- tag V2.0 | BAR.C(4) MAIN.C(2) FOO.C(1) | +<--- tag V2.1 | BAR.C(5) MAIN.C(2) FOO.C(2) |
However, that's impossible due to the design of CMS
Here, to import from CMS each class becomes a branch, variants are stripped
by the generation suffix, BAR.C(1A1) becomes BAR.C.1A, and are inserted into
the master. When the CMS elements are added to a class "INSERT GENERATION
/GEN=1A1 BAR.C ECO_1.1" a branch ECO_1.1 is created from the root of the
repository, BAR.C.1A is located and inserted as BAR.C into the branch.
This also means that after an import from the history a cleanup of all the variants from the master should be done - not yet implemented in the below menitoned perl script.
Also, after importing, the tags to identify CMS generations can be removed - not yet implemented in the below menitoned perl script.
And tagging current state of the branches with the associated CMS class names should be done - not yet implemented in the below menitoned perl script.
So, at the moment the above CMS diagram is imported into Git as (to identify the CMS elements their versions are added):
master |`-----------&------------&------------&------------& | V1.0 V2.0 ECO 1.1 V2.1 BAR.C(1) | | | | FOO.C(1) | | | | MAIN.C(1) | | | | | BAR.C(1) | | | | FOO.C(1) | | | | MAIN.C(1) | | | BAR.C(2) | | | MAIN.C(2) | | | BAR.C(3) | | | | BAR.C(3) | | | FOO.C(1) | | | MAIN.C(2) | | BAR.C.1A | | | BAR.C(1A1) | | FOO.C(1) | | MAIN.C(1) | BAR.C(4) | | BAR.C(4) | FOO.C(1) | MAIN.C(2) BAR.C(5) FOO.C(2)
There are tools to import from a CMS library into a Git repository. Optionally, an import is done for all elements from
The first two import types can be combined. That is, one can import the main
line and different classes into the same Git repository.
The third import option can not be combined with any other option. However, as described above, it is tried to create a main line and all classes as branches in the Git repository (based on the CMS commands as logged in the history). Currently this will not work for all CMS libraries, as CMS accepts commands which will rename or even delete the element and so makes it hard to find and keep track of the original elements.
For demonstration there are two tools available to do the import. One tool, a perl script, runs on the system with the Git repository. The other tool is an http server runing on the VMS system with the CMS library. The perl script sends CMS commands to the http server. The server executes the CMS commands in its environment and sends files/content back to the perl script. The perl script writes the received content into files and adds them to the Git repository.
USAGE: git-cmsimport.pl [OPTION]... LIBRARY URL Import the latest generation of all elements from the CMS LIBRARY (in VMS syntax) located by the URL. Creates a Git repository and adds the retrieved CMS elements to the master. IMPORT MODE OPTIONS -c CLASS Import all the elements of the CMS class CLASS, which are added to the branch CLASS. -h Import the full CMS LIBRARY according to its history. Creates a repository with the elements in the master and branches for classes. OPTIONS -e Use empty commits to log actions, which aren't based on changes: create/delete class (in the master) and insert generation (in the associated branch), which re-uses the log message of the element -f FILE Use the retrieval information in FILE to retrieve the CMS elements; without an IMPORT MODE OPTION or with -c CLASS a list of elements is expected, with the IMPORT MODE OPTION -h a history is expected -F Do not import, only save the retrieval information into a file; without an IMPORT MODE OPTION or with -c CLASS a list of elements is saved into ./cms-elements.txt, with the IMPORT MODE OPTION -h the history is saved into ./cms-history.txt -l Lowercase all VMS names: library, user and elements -t OFFSET 4 digit time zone offset from UTC (rfc2822) -v Verbose, log CMS FETCH commands. Examples: git-cmsimport.pl -F -h [.cmsdemo] http://eisner.encompasserve.org:8080 git-cmsimport.pl -f cms-history.txt -h -l -t -0600 [.cmsdemo] http://eisner.encompasserve.org:8080
The http server should be started from an empty directory. To fetch CMS elements from the CMS library, the server creates files in the default directory. After transmission of the content to the perl script, the file is deleted. Starting from an empty directory makes it easier to clean up in case of errors.
CMS remarks eventually will be used as Git commit messages. The remark is used as it was formatted by CMS. That is, it may consist of several lines.
As already indicated, the CMS commands (as shown in the history)
DELETE ELEMENT name MODIFY ELEMENT oldname newname
create some problems.
DELETE deletes the whole element from the CMS library. Which means there was a "CREATE ELEMENT name" in the history, maybe followed by some "REPLACE name" entries, and finally this "DELETE ELEMENT name". With the element gone and all traces removed the element can't be found and can't be imported at the time the perl script sees and processed the "CREATE ELEMENT name" entry (or any of the subsequent REPLACE entries) in the CMS history. The perl script doesn't look ahead to know about the deletion. So the CMS command is processed but the script will very likely abort with an error message.
However, it may even do something, if the deleted element was re-created later with the very same name. This is bad, very bad!
The same is true for a "MODIFY ELEMENT oldname newname", which essentially renames an element. Again, anything in the history referencing "oldname" can not be imported by this script. And again, if "oldname" is reused, the trouble doubles or even more.
What can be done here, is to save the history with -F, check the history entries for such commands and do a preprocessing. That is remove all entries of a deleted element, but only prior to the actual deletion. And, rename all entries of a renamed element, again only prior to the actual rename. Then an import with -f should work.
By the way, deleting a class is OK, and it is "imported". In Git, the associated branch is gone, but with -e, empty commits, there are traces of that.